DecisionSheet

How long do you have to stay for buying to beat renting?

By DecisionSheet · Updated · 2026 tax figures

The answer is a year, the crossover year: the first year from which a buyer who sold the home would have at least as much wealth as a renter who invested instead, and keep it to the end. DecisionSheet's rent vs. buy calculator reports it directly. With every default in place it reports "Never": renting stays ahead for all 30 years. Raise the rent from $2,400 to $3,500, holding everything else, and the crossover is year 6.

A common rule of thumb says to buy only if staying at least 5 years. It is a rule of thumb; no source is cited for it here. Across the cases below, the model's crossover ranges from year 6 to never, plus one test case with no selling cost that crosses in year 2.

What the crossover year measures

The model follows two households from the same starting cash, month by month for 30 years.

Net worth for the buyer is the after-sale proceeds plus any such investments; for the renter, the investment account. The crossover year is the first year-end from which the buyer's figure is equal or larger at every remaining year-end of the 30 years.

The default case: no crossover

The defaults are a $550,000 home against $2,400 a month in rent, a price-to-rent ratio (price divided by a year's rent) of 19.1. In the first month the buyer pays $4,014 and the renter $2,421, rent plus insurance.

After year 1 the renter is ahead by $56,411. At year 5, the rule's mark, the buyer would leave a sale with $202,146 and the renter holds $295,905, a gap of $93,759. The gap widens every year and reaches $1,305,818 at year 30 (open this scenario). The default assumptions are 3.5% a year of home price growth, 3.5% a year of rent growth and an 8% annual return on the renter's investments. On these inputs, no length of stay within 30 years makes the buyer's net worth catch up.

A higher rent: crossover in year 6

Change one input, the rent, to $3,500. The price-to-rent ratio falls to 13.1, and the monthly outlays start closer: $4,014 to buy, $3,521 to rent (open this scenario).

Calculator summary tiles for a $550,000 home against $3,500 a month in rent: break-even in year 6, an initial monthly outflow of $4,014 to buy against $3,521 to rent, and year-30 net worth of $2.3M for the buyer and $1.4M for the renter.

The renter still leads after year 1, by $42,734, and still leads at year 5, by $8,157. In year 6 the buyer moves ahead by $2,698 and stays ahead to year 30, finishing $899,525 in front. Here the rule of thumb falls one year short.

Chart of net worth over 30 years for the same scenario. The renter's invested account starts higher, $142,747 against the buyer's $100,013 after year 1, and is still $8,157 ahead at year 5. The two lines cross in year 6, and the buyer's after-sale net worth finishes at $2,343,662 against the renter's $1,444,137.

What closing and selling costs do

A buyer who sells early pays two transaction costs the renter never does: $16,500 (3%) at purchase and, in this model, 6% of the home's value at sale. The model deducts the selling cost at every year-end, as if the home were sold that year.

In the $3,500 case at year 5, the home is worth $653,227 and the buyer's equity before a sale is $241,339. The 6% selling cost takes $39,193, leaving $202,146. Together with the closing costs, that is $55,693 of transaction costs, against a gap of $8,157 in the renter's favor.

Set the selling cost to zero, the only change from the $3,500 case, and the crossover moves from year 6 to year 2; at year 5 the buyer is ahead by $31,036 (open this scenario). A zero selling cost is a test, not a scenario; it isolates how much of the early deficit that one cost accounts for in this model.

A stressed case: a 7.5% mortgage rate

Take the $3,500 case and raise the mortgage rate from 6.5% to 7.5%, the only change. The buyer's first monthly outlay rises to $4,309, the renter is $34,137 ahead at year 5, and the crossover moves to year 11. Buying still finishes ahead at year 30, by $483,377 (open this scenario).

The investment return is the other assumption the answer leans on. Back at the default $2,400 rent, lowering the renter's assumed return from 8% to 5% produces a crossover in year 23 (open this scenario). At 5.5% there is none again: the renter is $27,291 ahead at year 30 (open this scenario). That return is an assumption, not a forecast; the model applies the same rate every year with no bad years.

Reading the five-year rule against the model

In these six cases the crossover is year 2 (the no-selling-cost test), 6, 11 and 23, and in two cases never. The rule names one number; the model's answer moves with the rent, the rate, the selling cost and the assumed return. The only case within a year of the rule is the $3,500 case, where the crossover comes one year later.

Assumptions and limits

Method and sources

The model is calculateRentVsBuy in the rent vs. buy calculator. It runs both households month by month, converts the annual investment return to an equivalent monthly rate, steps home value and rent once a year, and values the buyer as if selling at each year-end. Every figure above is the model's output for the inputs in the scenario links; other inputs are the calculator's defaults: 1.1% property tax, $1,800 a year of insurance, $120 a month HOA, 1% maintenance, 2.5% general inflation.

Open this scenario in the calculator

All figures on this page come from the Rent vs. Buy calculator. Change any input there and the numbers update.