DecisionSheet

Is leasing ever cheaper? Two lease cycles vs. one loan over six years

By DecisionSheet · Updated · 2026 tax figures

Leasing costs less cash in this comparison, and buying ends with more wealth. Both statements come from the same run of DecisionSheet's lease-vs-buy model, and the gap between them is the car.

The case is the calculator's default: a $42,000 car, bought with $5,000 down and a 60-month loan at 5.9%, or leased for $480 a month with $3,000 due at signing, a 36-month term and a $400 disposition fee (the charge for returning the car at the end of a lease). The model follows both paths for 6 years: one loan, paid off in year five, against 2 back-to-back leases. After 6 years the buyer is $1,211 ahead (open this scenario).

Calculator summary tiles for a $42,000 car over 6 years: buyer monthly payment $770 a month for 60 months, lessee monthly payment $480 a month plus $3,000 at signing, residual car equity $16k for the buyer, and a 6-year net advantage of $1k to buying.

What each path owns at the end

The buyer finances the price plus 7% sales tax ($2,940) less the down payment: $39,940 at 5.9%, or $770.30 a month for 60 months. After the last payment the buyer keeps the car. The model values it by taking the 15% annual depreciation input off its value every year, spread across the months so that each twelve-month stretch removes exactly that share. At year 6 the car is worth $15,840, 38% of its price, and the buyer owns all of it.

The lessee owns no car at the end, only a portfolio. Each month the model compares the two paths' payments, and whichever side paid less invests the difference at the 7% return assumption. That return is an assumption, not a forecast.

So the buyer ends with $15,840 of car and $9,778 of portfolio, $25,618 in all, and the lessee with $24,407. The lessee's portfolio is $14,629 larger; the car more than covers it.

Total outflows vs. net wealth

The calculator's two totals point in opposite directions.

Outflows are the cash each side hands over. The buyer pays $5,000 down and 60 loan payments: $51,218. The lessee pays 2 down payments ($6,000), 72 lease payments ($34,560) and a $400 disposition fee at each return: $41,360. Leasing costs $9,858 less cash.

Net wealth is what each side holds at the end: car equity plus portfolio for the buyer, portfolio alone for the lessee. Here buying leads by $1,211. The calculator's tile labels this lead "Buying ends ahead": a lead in net wealth, not in cash paid out.

At a 0% return the two reconcile: the buyer's lead is the car's value less the extra cash the buyer paid, $15,840 less $9,858, which the model reports as $5,983. At 7% the lead is $4,772 smaller. The lessee invests more ($18,837 against $8,979) and invests all of it in the first five years, while most of the buyer's arrives in year six, so the return adds more to the lessee's side.

A lessee partway through a contract still owes the payments left on it, and the model deducts them from the lessee's wealth in every year's figures, as it deducts the buyer's unpaid loan. At year one, with $11,520 of payments still owed, the buyer leads by $8,622. At year three, when the first lease is returned and nothing is owed, the lessee leads by $5,209. A year into the second lease, with $11,520 owed, the buyer leads by $9,531; at year five, with $5,760 owed, by $4,796. Each year's figure is the result of a comparison that ends that year (the five-year one). The zigzag in the chart is that deduction: the lessee's line is pulled down while a lease is under way and recovers at each return.

Area chart of net wealth by year for the buyer and the lessee. The lessee's line zigzags: it is pulled down in years 1, 2, 4, 5, when payments are still owed on a lease, and recovers at each return, in years 3 and 6. The buyer is ahead in every year except year 3, when the lessee leads by $5,209; the buyer's widest lead is $9,531 in year 4, and in year 6 the buyer holds $25,618 against the lessee's $24,407.

Which input flips the answer

Each input below was moved on its own until the buyer's lead reached zero. The table is sorted by how far each input had to move, as a percentage of its default.

Input Default Value that erases the buyer's lead Change
Vehicle price $42,000 $43,013 +2.4%
Monthly lease payment $480 $466 −2.8%
Annual depreciation 15% 16.1% +7.5%
Loan rate 5.9% 6.8% +14.4%
Lease due at signing $3,000 $2,555 −14.8%
Investment return 7% 8.5% +21.8%
Sales tax rate 7% 9% +28.0%

Of the lease payment, depreciation and the investment return, the lease payment is the most sensitive: $14 a month off the lease is enough. Depreciation comes second and the return third. One scenario past each break-even, each a lease win outside the $1,000 tie band:

The vehicle price needs the smallest change of all, but only because the model takes the lease payment as a separate input: raising the price alone makes only the buy side dearer.

The disposition fee cannot flip this comparison. It is money the lessee pays and the buyer does not, so a larger fee widens the buyer's lead: at $2,000 it is $4,771.

Assumptions and limits

Method and sources

The model is calculateLeaseVsBuy in the lease vs. buy calculator. It steps through both paths month by month. Break-even values were found by bisection against the same model, one input at a time.

Open this scenario in the calculator

All figures on this page come from the Lease vs. Buy Car calculator. Change any input there and the numbers update.